If you would like to access Science & Christian Belief online, read about how to subscribe.
Please log in
Subscriber number:
Password:
Lost your password?
Home | Search | Available Issues
Quick search by:
Author
Keyword:
Volume/page no:

Journal Information

Web links

We are probably not Sims

JOHN B. O. MITCHELL
S & CB 32 (1)
April 2020

Abstract

In this article, I discuss the current state of the debate around the simulation hypothesis, the idea that the world we inhabit is a computer simulation in or within another universe. Considering recent work from a range of authors, I suggest that statistical arguments in favour of a simulated world are naive and fail to account either for Ockham’s Razor or for alternative existential possibilities besides base reality and a simulation. Most significantly, I observe that it would be computationally impossible in our own universe to simulate a similar cosmos at fine granularity. This implies substantial differences in size and information content between simulating and simulated universes. I argue that this makes serious analysis of the simulation argument extremely difficult. I suggest that Christian theology has no reason to reinvent itself to accommodate simulism; the two should be viewed as mutually exclusive world-views. Further, I note that the existence of a human soul or spirit, or indeed any non-reductionist explanation of human consciousness, could undermine the assumption of substrate independence that simulism requires.

Back to last page
Christians in Science logo  Victoria Institute logo  Paternoster Publishing Logo
© 2020 Science & Christian Belief