If you would like to access Science & Christian Belief online, read about how to subscribe.
Please log in
Subscriber number:
Password:
Lost your password?
Home | Search | Available Issues
Quick search by:
Author
Keyword:
Volume/page no:

Journal Information

Web links

Paul and the Person

Brian G. Edgar
S & CB 12 (2)
October 2000

Abstract

Discussions of Biblical anthropology inevitably lead to the question as to whether it is fundamentally monist or dualist in form. In his recent article ‘Scripture and the Human Person: Further Reflections’ Joel Green put forward the modest proposal that anthropological monism is at least consistent with several New Testament passages which have often been interpreted in dualist fashion. This article takes this discussion a step further and interprets the Pauline data in the light of Paul’s soteriological purposes. The conclusion is that Paul deliberately varies his anthropological ontology in order to defend more central anthropological themes. It is argued that following Paul’s anthropology means more than accepting his ontological conclusions, it means adopting a method. This is shown to have implications for the contemporary use of biblical ontologies of the person.

Back to last page
Christians in Science logo  Victoria Institute logo  Paternoster Publishing Logo
© 2021 Science & Christian Belief